I would rather read around a subject and find out the 'truth' for myself. It is irrelevant how many people are publishing blogs, video, music. And while methinks the BBC and other media companies very much do care what the audience thinks, it is certainly a moot point whether this discussion matters at all. Experience has proved this view to be rubbish. In many ways what they do is right for their long trm survival, what is wrong is what the secular group is doing, as this is now ageing and is under serious risk of extinction through a low TFR and b long term dysgenic blight through the above differential fertility. I'm not so keen on this fellow, Keen, or his book the "Cult of the Amateur.
Registration of birth figures indicate that our weak pro-natalist eugenic measures aren't that effective, and good parents know why. If less able people have far above replacement level sized families, and more able have below replacement level 2. Writers and editors have imperfect knowledge so write and publish only what they 'think' is accurate. The market for professionalism and judicious and truthful journalism remains as srong as ever. Forgive me if I stick to Aristotle and give Mr Keen's book a miss! They were wrong then and Andrew Keen is just as wrong now. News of this plan was place in an exotic blog and news of it travel fast.
The web is just another form of publishing. The week's best photojournalism. Groups which encourage sex based equal opportunity clever white heterosexual people? Retrieved 7 October My solution is a Certificate of Voting Competence, to be studied for, and awarded by, examination.
Why is there no preview of Keen's book on Google books? Korea has the problem too. It is Yid net v Yob net! But there's also some stunningly good stuff. I wouldn't be too worried about the poor lambs being led astray by the nasty bloggers. Perhaps he's bitter about having some drivel edited out of Wikipedia Many espousing such views would deny that that's what they subscribe to, but that's how invidious it is.